Who’s The Criminal?

There is a major distinction between a case that relies on the word of less than credible witnesses (a weak case) and a case where the witnesses are allegedly told to lie or are blackmailed into testifying in a certain way.
There is a major distinction between a case that relies on the word of less than credible witnesses (a weak case) and a case where the witnesses are allegedly told to lie or are blackmailed into testifying in a certain way.

Perhaps the media and the various “experts” should reconsider salivating over the recent information stemming from the Michael Cohen plea agreement in light of the lawsuit filed by Jerome Corsi.  According to Fox News, “Corsi filed a ‘criminal and ethics complaint’ against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving ‘false testimony’ against President Trump.”  If this is true, Michel Cohen’s “admissions” will be rendered virtually meaningless, and Robert Mueller’s investigation should be immediately terminated.

As part of his plea agreement, Michael Cohen admitted to making false statements in a letter to Congress in 2017 regarding a 2016 Moscow building project that was being considered by the Trump administration.  According to Cohen, the discussions regarding the deal continued until June 2016, as opposed to January 2016, as he previously stated in his letter.

Many well respected legal scholars have opined that Cohen’s admission has no bearing on President Trump and the Russia investigation.  According to Alan Dershowitz, “special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe is creating crimes rather than uncovering past ones,” and the “devastating” report he will write will be based on people “who have lied.”  Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett agreed with Dershowitz.  According to National Review’s Andrew McCarthy, Mueller is building a report as opposed to a legal case.  Said McCarthy, “With respect to the president and ‘collusion,’ Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating.  He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.”  Together, these comments paint a picture of an investigation that is reeling and a prosecutor hoping to find something he can use against the president that would justify his interminable investigation.

Despite the fact that Mueller’s investigation appears to rely on the statements of people whose credibility is, at best, highly questionable, Corsi’s recent lawsuit, if verifiable, adds an entirely new problem for Robert Mueller and his team.  According to Fox News, and pursuant to Corsi’s complaint, “they wanted him to demonstrate that he acted as a liaison between Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on one side and the Trump campaign on the other, regarding the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.”  Furthermore, Corsi alleged that Robert Mueller’s office is “knowingly and deceitfully threatening” to charge him with providing a false statement unless he provides “false testimony” against Trump and others.

[Read It All]

See Also:

(1) Is Mueller Probe Suborning Perjury?

(Visited 82 times, 82 visits today)
avatar
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
JackHynd Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Hynd
Guest
Hynd

Mueller will issue his report long before Corsi gets his day in court and will have caused all the damage he can before his report is destroyed by the courts, years from now.