What A Splendid Idea

The Trump election signaled a desire for a sea-change and, now that things have come to this pass, it’s time to sink the showboat on the Potomac and move on.
The Trump election signaled a desire for a sea-change and, now that things have come to this pass, it’s time to sink the showboat on the Potomac and move on.

In the annals of American political showboating, it’s tough to top the annual circus called the State of the Union message. Mandated by the Constitution—and at first delivered to Congress in written form—it has metastasized since the Wilson Administration into a full-blown political rally, celebrating not the party in power, but the president of the United States personally. Once a year, at the invitation of the Speaker of the House, he commands the attention not only of the Congress, but also members of the Supreme Court. It’s the nearest thing we have to a monarchical moment: all pomp and damn little circumstance, offering a president the chance to reel off, at stupefying length, a laundry list of policy prescriptions that have almost no chance ever of being realized. In short, the hot air that keeps the Capitol dome inflated doesn’t get much hotter than this.

This year, however, may be different. In their ongoing tug-of-war over the partial government shutdown, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has decided to stick her thumb in the eye of President Donald Trump and, citing security concerns, has asked him to delay his scheduled January 29 State of the Union address until the government re-opens or, alternatively, send it up the Hill in writing, as every president from George Washington to William Howard Taft did.

What a good idea.

The key to understanding what the SOTU was meant to address in the first place can be found in its Article II constitutional wording, which states that the president “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” Accordingly, early presidents concentrated on the nuts-and-bolts of government, including budget requests, the general economy, and other mundane matters.

It wasn’t until Wilson, who prior to the election of Barack Obama was the most “progressively” radical president we’d ever had, that the annual message started morphing into the thing we know today—a full-throated advertisement for the president’s foreign and domestic policies, symbolizing the shift of power from the legislative branch to the executive.

Now, thanks to Pelosi, Trump has an opportunity to turn it into something else altogether: an actual report on the “State of the Union.” As Pelosi’s sidekick, U.S. Representative Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), cracked: “the state of the union is off.” Boy, is it ever.

[…]

See Also:

(1) Shutdown standoff: Pelosi renews call to delay State of the Union, Trump says Dems ‘hijacked’ by ‘fringe’

(2) Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip in response to call for State of the Union delay

(3) When Did It Become the FBI’s Job to Act as a Check and Balance to the President?

(4) Send the Little Sisters of the Poor birth control cases back to the Supreme Court

(5) Understanding Why the Deep State Had to Take Down General Michael Flynn

(Visited 85 times, 85 visits today)
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
BTDT
Guest
BTDT

Speaking of splendid ideas. Maybe if he wants to really make Democrat heads pop off like fireworks on the 4th of July, Trump should consider this. Schedule the SOTU in a 90,000 seat sports stadium. The Secret Service, DHS and military could handle security no problem. Provide priority seating for members of the SCOTUS and politicians. But make history by also inviting for the first time about 89,500 American citizens to fill the remaining seats. The State of the Union is just as if not more important to them. So report first hand to as many in person as possible.… Read more »