Swingin’ Supremacists

C'mon, Justice Kennedy. Obamacare v. Playboy: It would be a decision for the ages — and an act of bracing constitutional hygiene.
C’mon, Justice Kennedy. Obamacare v. Playboy: It would be a decision for the ages — and an act of bracing constitutional hygiene.

Today was Brett Kavanaugh’s first day on the Supreme Court, following last night’s ceremonial swearing-in by Kavanaugh’s mentor Anthony Kennedy. The last month has certainly demonstrated the high stakes of judicial confirmation. But just why is the Court so important? And what would America’s founders have to say about that? Here’s what I wrote in my column back in Kennedy’s marriage-redefining heyday:

Since the retirement of Sandra Day O’Connor, Swingin’ Anthony Kennedy has been the swingingest swinger on the Supreme Court, the big Numero Cinco on all those 5–4 white-knuckle nail-biting final scores. So naturally Court observers have been paying close attention to his interventions in the Obamacare oral arguments. So far he doesn’t sound terribly persuaded by the administration’s line:

“The government is saying that the federal government has a duty to tell the individual citizen that it must act, and that is different from what we have in previous cases, and that changes the relationship of the federal government to the individual in a very fundamental way.” As John Hinderaker wrote at the Powerline blog, “In that last observation, Kennedy seems to be channeling Mark Steyn.” Which is true. As I wrote in National Review only two or three issues back, “I’ve argued for years in these pages that governmentalized health care fundamentally transforms the relationship between citizen and state in ways that” — and here’s the bit Justice Kennedy isn’t quite on board with yet — “make it all but impossible to have genuinely conservative government ever again.” So I’m naturally heartened to hear him meeting me halfway. This was one of the highlights of a week that a shell-shocked Jeffrey Toobin, crawling out from under the rubble of the solicitor general’s presentation, told CNN viewers was “a train wreck” for the government’s case.

And yet, and yet . . . If you incline to the view that Obamacare is a transformative act, isn’t there something slightly pitiful about the fact that the liberties of over 300 million people hinge on the somewhat whimsical leanings of just one man? I mean, Kennedy seems a cheery enough cove, but who died and made him the all-powerful Sultan of Swing? “It is a decision of the Supreme Court,” explained Nancy Pelosi a few years back in more congenial times for the Democrats. “So this is almost as if God has spoken.”

[Read It All]

See Also:

(1) Trump talks to press nearly nonstop as wins pile up: ‘We’ve never had that kind of access’

(2) Democrats look, shout and storm like a mob

(3) Judicial Watch Uncovers More Classified Material on Hillary Clinton’s Unsecure Email System

(4) Perkins Coie Lawyer Michael Sussmann’s Coordinated Leaks to Media and FBI’s James Baker, Likely Came From Steele, Fusion GPS

(5) IG Report Shows Obama Lied About Hillary’s Secret E-mail Scheme

(6) Rush Limbaugh: Hillary Clinton, Dems court ‘deranged’ radicals because ‘that’s their base’

(7) The Democrats’ Kavanaugh Gambit Will Swing the Midterms to the GOP

(8) The Argument Chuck Schumer Doesn’t Have the Courage to Make

(9) Michelle Malkin: The Most Important Movie You’ve Never Heard Of

(10) Why the Left Won’t Take Up Originalism

(Visited 34 times, 3 visits today)