Roe, Roe, Roe Your Boat

Roe probably won’t be overturned because it probably won’t come up; Casey is the center of abortion law nowadays.
Roe probably won’t be overturned because it probably won’t come up; Casey is the center of abortion law nowadays.

It was my honor to befriend Judge Robert Bork in the last years of his life. Not surprisingly, I don’t find much amusement in the cesspool that judicial-confirmation politics has become since his name became a synonym for slander in 1987 — a debacle that changed history for the worse in more ways than the woodenly whimsical Anthony Kennedy’s assumption of what should have been the Bork seat.

Still, I admit to chuckling over the musings of Senator Susan Collins of Maine, a “moderate” Republican in the Kennedy mold. With the justice announcing his retirement after 30 years on the Court, a confirmation battle royale is shaping up over his successor, whom President Trump is expected to nominate on Monday. On cue, Senator Collins has let it be known that she would look askance at any nominee who has “demonstrated hostility [towards] and an eagerness to overturn Roe v. Wade.”

Go ahead and Roe, Roe, Roe your boat, Senator. Thanks to Justice Kennedy, we’ve actually been living in a Casey world — as in Planned Parenthood v. Casey — for the past quarter century. For good and for ill. Don’t you dare touch Roe” is the political hyperbole of Democrats and their fellow travelers. It is not a serious legal position — as if serious legal positions had anything to do with confirmation politics.

Here is reality: Casey’s refinement of the right judicially manufactured in Roe granted expansive and expanding room to regulate abortion. The validity of those regulations, not the core holding of Roe, is what dominates abortion litigation nowadays. It is unlikely that cases will present a need to grapple with Roe, it is even less likely that Roe will be overturned, and even if this highly unlikely event were to come to pass, it would not render abortion illegal. Instead, abortion would once again be a question for the states, the vast majority of which would guarantee some degree of access to abortion. We are not going to move into a post-Roe era, but even if we did, no woman who could obtain an abortion today would be unable to get one post-Roe.

[Interesting Read]

See Also:

(1) Nunes calls for House probe of 42 Obama-era anti-Trump activists

(2) Who Killed the Center-Left?

(3) Mitch McConnell confronted by ‘Abolish ICE’ protesters, video shows

(4) Mexico: AMLO to Seek Negotiated Peace in Drug War

(5) How to help Trump: Just keep shouting ‘Abolish ICE’

(6) Never Trumpers Told Us Trump Would Be Liberal, He Wasn’t; No Alternative Agenda

(7) Liberal states impose new individual mandate ahead of ObamaCare rollback

(8) Amy Coney Barrett criticized for ties to People of Praise: A look at the group

(9) Statue of Liberty climber identified as immigrant activist

(10) Judicial Watch Sues CIA for Documents on Dossier Leak to Senator Harry Reid

(Visited 26 times, 6 visits today)