How many people, knowing they have their opponents caught red-handed in what now appears to be the worst political scandal of our lifetime, would wait until those people and their press cohorts fell on their faces before acting on it? Not many, I think, but that seems exactly what President Trump just did.

I know, you have been inundated by claims of “Russian influence” brought to bear mysteriously and for no discernible end by the major media. The latest tarring involved Attorney General Sessions meeting with the Russian ambassador about which we are supposed to be shocked, and an utterly baseless claim that he lied to Senator Al Franken when he testified before Congress.

A. Background

Did Attorney General Sessions Lie?

No, It’s a confected claim, which depends on taking one answer out of context. Robert Barnes Lawnewz explains:

Here is the key exchange: Franken asked about “a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Sessions answered: “I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.” Anyone reading the actual exchange can see Sessions was referring to no communications “as a surrogate” just as the question’s very long pre-amble specifically referenced the focus of the question to that subject matter. Nothing about Sessions’ answer was false, nor could it be construed to be materially false or willfully false, or even false at all.

Notably, Senator Franken chose not to ask Sessions about his contacts with Russian officials over the years in his duties as a Senator on the Armed Services Committee. Sessions’ first meeting of the Russian ambassador was in public, and likely known to Franken and others. Franken could not have interpreted Sessions’ answer as anything but an answer to the question asked about campaign contacts with Russian government officials, which no evidence supports ever occurring. Indeed, given what Franken knew, one might fairly ask a different question: why did Franken avoid that specific question? Was it because he’s a lousy Senator, like he was a mediocre comedian? Maybe. Or Maybe it’s because Franken knew the answer would undermine Franken’s argument? Or maybe it was because Franken was planning on mis-using the answer to attack Sessions later?

What next? Senator, have you now, or have you ever been, someone who ever talks with Russians? GUILTY! Doing your job is now considered a crime by the same people on the left who excused actual crime by their Presidential candidate and Presidential appointee. This question needs to be asked of the Sessions smear operators: do you have no shame?

Is There Something Nefarious About Senators Meeting with the Russian Ambassador?

Read it all…

See Also:

Trump plan for 40% cut could cause EPA science office ‘to implode,’ official warns

The polls actually show that Trump is still winning

Huge Crowd at Nashville Spirit of America Rally in Support of President Trump

Blair in ‘SECRET WHITE HOUSE TALKS to become Trump’s Middle East envoy’, reports claim (Ed: Trump needs to end this bullshit quickly.)

Republicans need to support Trump or ‘find themselves out of job’

Democrats’ Ferocious Malevolence Matched by Congressional Republicans’ Cowardice

Two House Republicans Join Democratic Effort Demanding Trump Release Tax Returns

On the eve of the insurrection

Limbaugh: We’re Watching a Silent Coup Put in Place By Obama and the Democrats

Krauthammer: No Question Obama Left Behind ‘Landmines’ For Trump, ‘Revenge of the Losers’

Hannity Tweetstorm Grills Obama & Underlings on FISA Trump Attack

Trump to sign new travel ban on Monday: report

America First policy will help aviation sector

Why Trump Should Quit the Dangerous and Immoral United Nations’ International Treaty on Climate Change

House GOP rolls out $577.9 billion defense spending bill

House GOP eyes three-week plan on Obamacare; Ryan: ‘We’re going to unify’

(Visited 25 times, 6 visits today)
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Quote: “The proposed cuts could cause EPA’s research office “to implode,” warns a senior EPA official. “This is serious stuff. We’re all concerned about what might happen, not just to our livelihoods, but to our ability to support the agency’s mission,” says the official, who does not have authorization to speak to reporters and so requested anonymity.”

I do feel sorry for some of the staff who will be affected, but that’s the result when the “mission” moves away from science and becomes pseudo-scientific whitewash and political cover for the misdeeds of their government and bosses.