What we need is a credible prosecutor.

Republicans, whether in the White House or on Capitol Hill, do not seem to appreciate how much they may be undermining what they say they want — a serious investigation of the Clinton Foundation and such related matters as the Uranium One transaction, the interplay between the foundation and the operation of the State Department during Secretary Clinton’s tenure, and the question of whether that interplay explains the use of the improper private email system and the destruction of tens of thousands of emails.

The president has been railing about his own Justice Department’s apparent inaction (after signaling, post-election, that he did not want to see the Clintons further investigated and prosecuted). A group of House Republicans has taken up this cause and is pushing for the appointment of a special counsel. In essence, it is a tit-for-tat maneuver: There is a special-counsel probing Trump ties to Russia, they reason, so why not a special-counsel to probe Clinton ties to Russia?

This suggests a basic misunderstanding about what triggers a special-counsel investigation: There must be potential offenses that warrant investigation as to which the Justice Department has a conflict of interest that would make its conducting the investigation inappropriate.

Interesting Read…

See Also:

(1) Jarrett: Hillary Clinton must face the consequences of her actions and the scrutiny of a special counsel (Ed: Jarret obviously disagrees with McCarthy.)

(2) Drip, drip: Bill Clinton’s reckoning nears

(3) Filling military quotas with the mentally ill

(4) Democrats use loss of deduction to drown out message about tax bill’s benefits to middle class

(5) Democrats are trying to block Trump’s judge picks with vile, hypocritical smears

(6) Grassley Will Not Allow Senators to Use ‘Blue Slip Courtesy’ to Block Trump’s Judicial Nominees

(Visited 24 times, 4 visits today)