Above The Law

The message from the Clinton email scandal, the Mueller investigation, and the careers of Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and McCabe seems to be that if the government wishes a document then do not provide it.
The message from the Clinton email scandal, the Mueller investigation, and the careers of Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and McCabe seems to be that if the government wishes a document then do not provide it.

Imagine the following: The IRS sends you, John Q. Citizen, a letter alleging you have not complied with U.S. tax law. In the next paragraph, the tax agency then informs you that it needs a series of personal and business documents. Indeed, it will be sending agents out to discuss your dilemma and collect the necessary records.

But when the IRS agents arrive, you explain to them that you cannot find about 50 percent of the documents requested, and have no idea whether they even exist. You sigh that both hard copies of pertinent information have unfortunately disappeared and hard drives were mysteriously lost.

You nonchalantly add that you smashed your phone, tablet, and computer with a hammer. You volunteer that, of those documents you do have, you had to cut out, blacken or render unreadable about 30 percent of the contents. After all, you have judged that the redacted material either pertains to superfluous and personal matters such as weddings and yoga, or is of such a sensitive nature that its release would endanger your company or business or perhaps even the country at large.

You also keep silent that you have a number of pertinent documents locked up in a safe hidden in your attic unknown to the IRS. Let them find it, you muse. And when the agents question your unilateral decisions over hours of interrogatories, you remark to them on 245 occasions that you have no memory of your acts—or you simply do not have an answer for them.

In some instances, you state things that are not true, cannot be true by any stretch of the imagination, and contradict things you have said in the past—and you make it clear that you don’t think much of such inconsistencies. When pressed with contradictory evidence, you nonchalantly reply that you gave the “least untruthful” answer.

What would happen to you, a typical American citizen, should you follow this current Washington model of erasing, redacting, omitting, forgetting, and lying?

Of course, you are a citizen and so must obey the law. Therefore, you might well find yourself either broke, out on bail, in jail, or mired in endless litigation. But since 2016 we have seen how many high government officials involved in any number of such investigations, were not so much citizens as hyper-citizens above the law, who felt they were not subject to audit. And they were largely right in their assumptions.

[Read It All]

See Also:

(1) A tear for the schoolmarm teaching civics to the House

(2) The Great Wall of America Will Break the Democrats

(3) Ocasio-Cortez attacks fact-checkers for ‘false equivalency,’ ‘bias’

(4) Care Bear Commies Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Are Dangerous. The Fightback Starts Here…

(5) Immigration will save Trump from the shutdown, and that makes the news media angry

(6) Exculpatory Russia evidence about Mike Flynn that US intel kept secret

(7) Trump and the WTO’s Uncertain Future

(8) ‘Free Speech’ Means Just That

(Visited 79 times, 79 visits today)
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
BTDT
Guest
BTDT

Trump’s Oval Office address to the nation last evening and heads are exploding all over the Dem Party and cable news. Good. Wait 48 hrs enjoying the show and then maybe President Trump should consider going on the offensive (like the Dems have been doing for over 2 years): – order the immediate release, unredacted, of all pertinent documents relating to the granting of the FISA warrants, the Clinton bought and paid for Dossier, Uranium One and the Clinton Email scandal. More exploding heads. Wait another 48 hrs; – call a news conference to announce the issuing of a Presidential… Read more »